Hi all,
Glad to have such a great forum here.

Anyhoo... I had a recent blood test and got a level of 1566. The doctor said "Ah, you'll have HH, no doubt, I'll get the tests done."
Today I find out that the genes for HH have come back normal. Normal!
I don't feel particularly bad/tired, but 1566? That's gotta be pretty high, yes? Even the doctor's notes had an exclamation mark in them after the reading. Both doctors I have been working with can't understand how I got that reading without the related HH genes.
Anyway, I was talking to a paediatrician today on another topic and mentioned my new 'mystery' of iron overload without HH. He said that Cystic Fibrosis started with only a few indicator genes back in the late 80s and now there are over 1,000 genes which can be checked for that one condition. He wondered if I might have some other type/form of HH for which genes have not yet been scientifically linked. Is that possible? I am of very 'Scottish' background, which puts me in the right Celtic background.
My brother has all the signs of HH, too -- he was told by his last doctor he might be having too much alcohol due to his high SF and poor liver function... even though he used to abstain completely and doesn't even have a second beer or wine at Christmas time. His symptoms are: liver is not so great, his skin is 'bronze' and he has tinnitus.
So high SF and no HH...
Could I have poisoned myself with some unknown source of iron?
Could the 'other related genes' hypothesis be valid?
Confused. Looking for any help/tips out there....?
In the mean time I'm off to a blood specialist tomorrow for more prodding and poking. I'll report back on the next piece of the puzzle.
Thanks!

[P.S. I feel lucky because (a) I don't feel that bad at all -- feeling in good health, in fact and (b) I have never really had a problem with needles/blood giving. Still worried about that SF level, though]